The question of whether students should actively participate in politics has been a subject of debate for many years. Some argue that students should focus solely on their studies and avoid political involvement, while others believe that political engagement is essential for their growth and development as future leaders of the nation.
In the past, during British rule in India, it was the duty of everyone, including students, to participate in the struggle for the country's liberation. However, in free India, the dynamics have changed, and some argue that students should refrain from actively engaging in political affairs.
Proponents of political involvement for students argue that they are an important section of society and should be trained in political affairs. They believe that practical training in politics will be beneficial if students have the opportunity to guide the destiny of the country in the future. Mere theoretical knowledge may not be sufficient for real-world challenges, and active political engagement can provide invaluable experience.
On the other hand, the orthodox view is that active political participation may corrupt students' moral character. Politics is often seen as a profession with little requirement for qualifications or fitness, yet it demands extraordinary ability. Corruption has become prevalent in the political field, and many politicians prioritize personal gain over public service. Genuine and principled political leaders like Gandhiji or Lincoln are rare exceptions.
Politics is often described as "poly-tricks," implying that politicians may not always act with integrity or principle. Plato, the student of Socrates, was disillusioned by the death of his teacher and concluded that retaining integrity while participating in politics was challenging. Similarly, Sir Robert Walpole, the first Prime Minister of England, used venal means to maintain his power.
Many student organizations in India claim loyalty to different political parties, and they often launch strikes and agitations as directed by these parties. Such actions not only damage public property but can also escalate to violence and even murder. In contrast, student unions in prestigious universities like Oxford and Cambridge do not engage in agitations, demonstrating a disciplined approach to student life.
Promoters of abstaining from political agitations argue that politics is too complex and demanding for the half-developed abilities of young students. They propose that students should focus on their education and acquire political knowledge through debates and discussions. After completing their education, they can decide to join a political party and contribute to the nation's welfare.
Ultimately, the decision to participate in politics as a student depends on individual beliefs, aspirations, and circumstances. While some may advocate for active involvement to gain practical experience, others may prioritize education and political knowledge from a distance. Regardless of the approach, students should always strive to study and learn, for knowledge is the foundation of growth and success. As the famous revolutionary leader Lenin once said, "Your first duty is to study, your second duty is to study, and your third duty is to study."